Practice in ALL Michigan
State and Federal Courts

P.O. Box 745 Grayling, Michigan 49738 Email: contactus@nyelaw.org
  Law Offices in
Bay City and Grayling

Toll Free: 1-877-4NYELAW
Phone: (989) 414-2724
Fax: (989) 414-2785

Nye Approved for Access to Bankruptcy Courts Program

Nye & Associates, PLLC was approved by a special committee affiliated with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan as an approved law firm for the Access to Bankruptcy Courts Program.  This program is a privately funded legal aid program to assist low income persons with paying for attorneys to prepare and file bankruptcies.   Recently, Attorney Nye attended a meeting in Detroit led by the Hon. Marci McIvor regarding the administration of the program.  Generally, persons whose income is less than 150 percent of the federal poverty guidelines are eligible for consideration by the program.  If approved by the committee, the applicant is then referred to an approved attorney who prepares and files the bankruptcy with the assistance of the client and is then paid a nominal fee for providing the legal services.  Nye & Associates, PLLC is honored to have been approved by this prestigious panel for providing top-notch bankruptcy legal services to the less fortunate in the community.  To apply, you can contact the program directly at this link: http://www.accesstobankruptcycourt.com/

Social Security Ruling 11-1p and its Effect on Disability Claimants

 

I stated in an earlier post that if denied at the ALJ Hearing level, you can appeal to the Appeals Council, file a new application, or do both. This information is now outdated.

 

Recently, Social Security handed down a new ruling that says when appealing an ALJ decision to the Appeals Council, claimants cannot file a new application, which changes what has been the rule since 1999. The now “old” rule allowed claimants to file a new application while their Appeal was pending at the Appeals Council (as the Appeals Council can take 18-30 months to make a decision).

 

What this means for claimants is that you must now choose between appealing the ALJ decision or filing a new application.  

 

This ruling is part of a series of changes that are meant to help Social Security to decrease their heavy workload (and as some suggest, to tighten their purse strings).

 

You may still file a new application if there has been a critical or disabling change in your condition. Discretion is left to the field office where you apply – if the particular worker finds that there has been a critical or disabling change, they will allow you to file that new application.

 

However, this will be the exception rather than the rule – it is likely that Social Security field offices will use this ruling as yet another reason to turn applicants down. Further, “critical and disabling” is not well-defined, so it is hard to tell what evidence you would need to show the field office in order for them to allow your new application.

 

There is some movement among attorneys that this ruling violates your Constitutional  Due Process rights, and it may well be stricken down in time, but for now, this is the new rule.

 

This rule does not apply if you are filing for a different title or for a different benefit. For example, if your current pending claim is for SSD (Title 16) benefits, and you have NOT filed for SSI (Title 2) benefits, you MAY file a new claim for SSI benefits if your SSD claim is pending at the Appeals Council.  

 

You may still submit new evidence of your disabling condition as long as it is before the date that you appealed to the Appeals Council – anything after that date will not be considered.  In that case, if you have evidence after you have appealed to the Appeals Council of your condition becoming critical or disabling, you may wish to dismiss your Appeals Council claim and file a new application.

 

Remember, you only have 60 days from the date of your denial letter to appeal.

 

If you have recently been denied by the ALJ and are trying to decide whether to appeal or to file a new application, please contact us for a free consultation.

 

 

Will Alternatives

 

Many people seek to avoid using a will at all – to avoid the cost and time of probate, to avoid attorney costs, or maybe they just don’t like the legal system. Whatever the reason, there are alternatives to using a will. The following are a few alternative planning strategies:

 

1. Deeds

 

This is one of the most over-looked planning tools. My favorite type of deed is what is called a “Ladybird” Deed or “enhanced life estate” deed. These types of deeds allow the present owner of a property to reserve a life estate in their property – that is, they keep the property until they pass away. The owner of that property can do whatever they want to do with the property. Upon their death, the property immediately passes to whoever the owner named in the deed. This completely avoids the probate process. A person may make a Ladybird Deed during their lifetime and record it at the Register of Deeds. Then, once they pass away, even if it is 15 years later, the property will automatically pass to the person on the deed, without any court involvement whatsoever. The person who inherits the property takes the stepped-up basis in the property rather than the original basis, and there is no uncapping of property tax. Therefore, this is an excellent, but often overlooked, planning tool.

 

2. Trusts

 

Trusts allow you to provide for other people as you want them to be provided for even after you have passed away. An attorney can draft one that suits your needs. Please see my previous article for more information about trusts.

 

3. Beneficiary Designations

 

More and more banks and insurance companies are allowing their clientele to designate a person to inherit any remaining money upon a person’s death. This is one of the absolute easiest ways to pass your property without using a will, going to probate, or involving the legal process at all.  Some insurance companies or banks have rules about who or what (i.e. a trust or LLC) that you can designate as your beneficiary, so check with them before making your beneficiary designations. 

 

4. Create an LLC

 

Do you have a cottage up North? Want to see it pass down in your family for generations? Create a limited liability company (LLC). These companies can be created for any purpose.  Transfer the cottage to the LLC. Upon your passing, the membership interest in the LLC will be transferred to your children.

 

LLCs require an Operating Agreement. In your Operating Agreement, you can prevent others outside the family from being able to have a membership interest in the LLC. This keeps the cottage from being exposed to creditors’ claims or your children’s spouses. The Operating Agreement can also provide for the management, use, and  maintenance of the cottage.

 

If you or someone you know needs any of the above planning tools, then please Nye & Associates for a consultation.  

 

Drunk Driving in Michigan

DUI, OWI, OWVI, OUID, OUIL Superdrunk what does this all mean and what are the differences?

There are a multitude of drinking and driving charges.

The main first offense charges are:

1) Operating While Visibly Impaired MCL 257.625(3),

2) Operating While Intoxicated MCL 257.625(1),

3) Operating with a High BAC MCL 257.625(1)(c), and

4) Operating With Any Presence of a Schedule 1 Drug MCL 257.625(8).

Operating while visibly impaired is when your blood alcohol content is below .08 but there is enough to noticeably impair your driving.

Operating while Intoxicated is driving with an blood alcohol content greater than .08. It makes no difference if your driving is not impaired.

Operating with a High BAC is also known as “Superdrunk” and occurs when you are driving with a blood alcohol content that us .17 or higher.

Operating With Any Presence of a Schedule 1 Drug can be illegal or legal drugs. If the drug is illegal also known as a Schedule One drug (which includes marijuana) then any amount in your blood will be enough for a conviction. If you are using a legal drug such as a prescribed pain pill, then it will have to be proven that the prescription pills are a controlled substance and impaired your driving and would be charged under OWI (Operating While Intoxicated MCL 257.625(1)(a))

 

These offenses have both criminal penalties as well as Secretary of the State driving penalties. The fallout for a first offense drinking charge is:

Charge

Maximum Jail Time

Community Service

Maximum Fines

Minimum Fines

Suspension

(No Driving)

Suspension

(Restricted)

Driving Points

Driver’s Responsibility Fees

OWVI 93 Days Up to 360 Hours $300.00 $0.00 0 Days 90 Days 4 Pts $500.00 for two years
OWI 93 Days Up to 360 Hours $500.00 $100.00 30 Days 150 Days 6 pts $1000.00 for two years
High BAC 180 Days Up to 360 Hours $700.00 $200.00 45 Days 325 Days 6 pts $1000.00 for two years
OWPD 93 Days Up to 360 Hours $500.00 $100.00 30 Days 150 Days 6 pts $500.00 for two years

 

This table does not include the penalties for aggravated drinking charges such as Operating While Intoxicated resulting in a Death or Injury and Child Endangerment Operating While Intoxicated which occurs when the person charged with a drinking related driving offense also has a child under 16 in the car.

For Second offenses, the penalties steeply increase.

Charge

Maximum Jail Time

Minimum Jail Time

Community Service

Maximum Fines

Minimum Fines

License Revocation

Driver’s Responsibility Fees

OWVI 1 Year 5 Days

30 Day Min.

90 Day Max.

$1,000.00 $200.00 365 Days $500.00 for two years
OWI 1 Year 5 Days

30 Day Min.

90 Day Max.

$1,000.00 $200.00 365 Days $1000.00 for two years
OWPD 1 Year 5 Days

30 Days Min.

90 Days Max.

$1,000.00 $200.00 365 Days $500.00 for two years

 

For second offenses there is not a suspension period on your license because your license is revoked for a year. In addition, High BAC only applies to a first offense charge.

 

Any third or subsequent offense is a felony in Michigan.

If you need help with any of these charges, Nye Law & Associates is more than capable of helping you.

Implied Consent, What is it and how does it hurt you?

If you are pulled over for suspected drunk driving, you are generally put through some field sobriety tests, concluding in a preliminary breath test (PBT) where you blow into a device and it checks your breath for blood alcohol levels. Then if the levels are above a certain amount, the officer will arrest you and take you to do a more formal blood alcohol test. This is either done though a breathalyzer called a Datamaster, or they draw  blood and send it in for testing.

If you do not wish to take the PBT or blow into the Datamaster, or allow blood to be drawn you have every legal right not to. The officer will then attempt to get a search warrant from the judge to allow him to have your blood drawn and checked. The potential criminal situation continues down that path.

What you might not be aware of is that there are driving penalties associated with refusing to take the PBT, Datamaster or allow your blood to be drawn. The Secretary of State has its own penalties associated refusing these procedures. In Michigan there is an Implied Consent law. Which means that as a driver, in order to drive, you are consenting to these tests should an officer reasonable ask for them.

The officer has at his discretion the decision to go forward with alerting Secretary of State of your implied consent refusal. Secretary of State will then suspend your license for a full year, with no restricted license available, in addition to 6 points being added to your license. This is mainly independent from the criminal charges, if your blood alcohol level was above a .08.

You do have an opportunity to fight this by appealing and having a hearing on the matter in front of (or most likely by video) a Secretary of State hearing administrator. There are four things that will be looked at

  1. If the officer had reasonable grounds to believe that you had committed a crime of operating a vehicle while intoxicated,
  2. Whether you were placed under arrest for this crime,
  3. If your refusal was reasonable, and
  4. Whether you were advised of your implied consent rights.

The burden is on the Government, in most cases the arresting officer, to prove that you violated the implied consent rule. The level of proof is by a preponderance of the evidence, which means anything over 50% sure that the implied consent rule was violated.

If you get an adverse ruling from the Secretary of State official you still have the opportunity to appeal to the Circuit Court where the offense took place. However, no new evidence can be presented, that judge will look at the evidence presented and transcript from the previous hearing and decide your case on either a hardship request or look at it for legal error.

Implied consent violations sneak up on you because people usually are not focused on possible Secretary of State action when looking a criminal charge in the face. However, we at Nye & Associates can help you.

Automatic Social Security Disability Benefits

 

There are a few ways adults may be found entitled to benefits automatically.

 

1. You meet a Listing. This is also called “meeting a Listing-level impairment.” This means that your condition meets or exceeds the listed severity of an impairment, which automatically entitles you to benefits.

 

2. You meet a Medical-Vocational Guideline (aka a “Grid Rule”). Social Security has outlined situations in which a person may be found automatically disabled if they are of certain age, education, work level, and of certain work restrictions. For example, if a person is age 55, has an 11th grade education, had past work that was “unskilled” under Social Security’s rules, and was limited to sedentary work, they are automatically entitled to benefits.

 

3. You meet a Medical-Vocational profile. There are three profiles:

 

The first profile is a claimant who meets step 2 with a severe, medically determinable impairment, who is age 55 or older, who has an 11th grade education or less, and who has no past relevant work experience.

 

The second profile, or “worn-out worker” profile, is a claimant who has a 6th grade education or less, who has worked 35 years at arduous, unskilled labor, and who is unable to continue to do that past arduous work.

 

The third profile is called the “lifetime commitment” profile. This describes a claimant who is not earning over $1,000 per month, who has a lifetime commitment (30 years or more) to work that is unskilled or that is skilled or semi-skilled with no transferable skills, who cannot perform this work due to their severe impairment (s), who is age 60 or older, and who has no more than an 11th grade education.

 

If you believe that you are entitled to automatic Social Security Benefits and have been denied, please call Nye & Associates for a free consultation.

 

Antrim County 86th District Court

86th District Court for Antrim County Michigan

205 East Cayuga Street

Bellaire, MI 49615

Hon. Judges Michael S. Stepka,  Thomas J. Phillips & Michael J. Haley

Magistrate Shirley Dewitt

Criminal Sentencings, June 2011;

  • operating while impaired; 22 year old Alden man sentenced to 365 days probation, $928.00 in fines and costs, $125.00 in restitution.
  • operating with out a license on person; 26 year old Grand Rapids man ordered to pay $208.00 in fines and costs.
  • operating with out a license on person; 25 year old Central Lake woman ordered to pay $308.00 in fines and costs.
  • assault/assault-and-battery; 20 year old Mancelona man was sentenced to 93 days in jail, $328.00 in fines and costs.
  • operating with out a license on person; 23 year old Kewadin woman ordered to pay $198.00 in fines and costs.
  • operating while intoxicated; 46 year old Mancelona man sentenced to 365 days probation, $678.00 in fines and costs.
  • operating with out a license on person; 44 year old Ponca Springs woman ordered to pay $248.00 in fines and costs.
  • operating with out a license on person; 40 year old East Jordan man ordered to pay $98.00 in fines and costs.
  • DNR hunt/shoot from safety zone; 22 year old East Jordan man ordered to pay $478.00 in fines and costs.
  • non-sufficient funds less than $100.00; 22 year old Lansing man sentenced to 366 days probation, $848.00 in fines and costs, $489.00 restitution.
  • operating  with suspended license; 22 year old Lake City man ordered to pay $583.00 in fines and costs.
  • possession of controlled substance/marijuana, operating while impaired; 24 year old Kalkaska man ordered to pay $1,631.00 in fines and costs, $125.00 restitution.
  • domestic violence 2nd offense/malicious destruction of personal property $200.00 2nd offense; 30 year old Mancelona man sentenced to 365 days in jail less 43 days served, $1,136.00 in fines and costs.
  • operating with out a license on person; 44 year old Detroit woman ordered to pay $208.00 in fines and costs.
  • operating while impaired; 29 year old Central Lake man sentenced to 15 days in jail less 15 days served, 365 days probation, $1,378.00 in fines and costs, $125.00 in restitution.
  • breaking and entering without owner’s permission; 29 year old Bellaire man sentenced to 2 days in jail, less 2 days served, 365 days probation, $1,083.00 in fines and costs.
  • alcohol/purchase/consume/poss-minor 3rd offense; 20 year old Warren man was sentenced to 183 days probation, $348.00 in fines and costs.
  • operating while impaired; 29 year old Western Springs, Illinois man sentenced to 360 days probation, 24 hours community service, $1,028.00 in fines and costs.

Criminal Sentencings, July 2011;

 

  • operating with suspended license; 32 year old Kalkaska man ordered to pay $483.00 in fines and costs.
  • operating with out license in possession; 31 year old Rapid City man ordered to pay $208.00 in fines and costs.
  • operating with out license in possession; 18 year old East Jordan man ordered to pay $208.00 in fines and costs.
  • operating while intoxicated/impaired, second offence; 24 year old Germfask woman ordered to pay $1,078.00 fines and costs, serve 120 days in jail.
  • domestic violence; 31 year old Charlevoix man sentenced to pay $628.00 in fines and costs, 21 days in jail, 550 days probation.
  • operating while impaired; 22 year old Washington man ordered to pay $1,028.00 in fines and costs, $125.00 restitution, serve 2 days in jail with 2 days credit, 360 days probation.
  • domestic violence, 2nd offense/attempted P/O, assault/resist/obstruction;  42 year old East Jordan man ordered to pay $1,736.00 fines and costs, 365 days in fail with 37 days credit.
  • license plate/reg/title – unlawful use; 19 year old Central Lake man oredered to pay $248.00 in fines and costs.
  • malicious destruction of personal property less than $200.00; 27 year old Elk Rapids man ordered to pay $528.00 in fines and costs, 365 days probation 2 days in jail with 2 days credit.
  • operating while intoxicated/impaired – 2nd offence; 29 year old Central Lake man ordered to pay $1,283.00 in fines and costs, $125.00 in restitution, 180 days in jail with credit for 133 days.
  • operating while impaired; 38 year old Mancelona man ordered to pay $1,278.00 in fines and costs, $125.00 in restitution,  24 hours community service, 366 days probation.
  • use of contained substance-narcotic/cocaine; 31 year old Mancelona man ordered to pay $1,583.00 in fines and costs, 90 days in jail with 6 days credit, 550 days probation.
  • driving while intoxicated; 49 year old Mancelona man ordered to pay $928.00 in fines and costs, $125.00 in restitution, 366 days probation.
  • operating while impaired; 23 year old Williamsburg man ordered to pay $1,028.00 fines and costs, $120.55 restitution, 24 hours community service, 366 days probation.
  • OUIL; 21 year old Clarkston woman ordered to pay $1,028.00 in fines and costs, $125.00 restitution, 24 hours community service, 366 days probation.
  • no proof of insurance; 25 year old Ellsworth man ordered to pay $165.00.
  • alcohol purchase-consume-possession, minor; 18 year old Walton man ordered to pay $273.00 fines and costs.

 

 

The End of Dispensaries

     Another bill, introduced as House Bill 4850, will effectively criminalize the dispensary business model.  The bill provides that the only authorized transfers under the Michigan Medical Marijuana Act are from a caregiver to a patient who is directly registered to that caregiver with the state.   Moreover, a caregiver can only recieve compensation from a patient registered directly to that caregiver with the state. Any transfers that are not directly between the caregiver and that caregiver’s registered patient are now going to be 2 year felonies.  So if you are a cancer patient, and your caregiver is your Uncle Bubba who did a darn poor job of growing your medicine, you would be subject to criminal prosecution if you got your medicine from your next door neighbor, who was also a caregiver (but not yours) and had grown excellent medicine. 

     Unfortuntately for patients (and fortunately for the Mexican drug cartels) there seem to be no advocates proposing counter-legislation in the Michigan legislature which is consistent with the the right of Michigan residents to use medical marijana and acquire that marijuana under any market-based system allowing for economies of scale, profit motive, and ultimately quality production of quality medicine.  Recently, the Criminal Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan (comprised of defense attorneys and prosecutors) adopted a recommendation that legislative reform in Michigan should adopt the Colorado model.  That model allows for strict regulation of the medical marijuana business, but recognizes and adopts basic, common sense regulation for large grow operations, vertically-integrated business models, profit-based systems, and corresponding taxation. 

     If you are a medical marijuana patient, then you should write your state senator and state representative that you oppose the current knee-jerk legislation proposed by reefer-madness-minded legislators and urge consideration and adoption of legislation similar to the progressive, highly-regulated, profit-based, and tax generating laws of Colorado.

Trust Basics

 

What is a Trust?

 

In legal terms, a trust is an entity created to hold assets to be managed for the benefit of someone else. The best way to think of a trust is like a box. A person takes assets and puts them into the “box” and they are kept in that box for the benefit of someone else.

 

How is a trust created?

 

A person called a “settlor” creates (or “settles” ) the trust, which is typically drawn up by an attorney.  The settlor choose a “trustee” to manage the trust assets for the benefit of a “beneficiary,” who may be a person, a group, or an entity. A trust may be created during a person’s life or in their will (this is called a “trust under will” or “testamentary trust”).

 

If you make a trust as part of your will, your assets will not be transferred to the trust until you pass away. Depending on your assets, this could have tax and other consequences for your beneficiaries.

 

What is a “revocable” or “irrevocable” trust? 

 

A “revocable” trust is a trust that can be changed. Typically a trust made while you are alive (an inter vivos trust) is a revocable trust, unless the terms of the trust state that it is irrevocable. This means that the settlor may put in assets and take them out again from the trust during their lifetime. They may also cancel (“revoke”) the trust altogether.

 

A trust that by its terms is “irrevocable” is a trust that assets cannot be taken back out of once they have been put in. In other words, that $50,000 you put into the trust for your grandchildren’s college education cannot be taken back out of an irrevocable trust if you fall on hard financial times.  

 

Certain types of trusts are always “irrevocable,” like life insurance trusts (ILITs).

 

Upon the settlor’s death, the trust – whether it is revocable or not during the settlor’s life – becomes irrevocable, meaning that the assets of the trust and its terms cannot be changed.  A trust made in a will is always irrevocable, as the settlor will have died before the trust comes into existence.

 

Why make a trust?

 A trust may be created for almost any purpose, and attorneys have been very creative in their drafting of trusts to meet their clients’ needs. Often, trusts are used to avoid probate or to keep family affairs private, as a will is public. A trust also offers some degree of protection to beneficiaries that a will may not.   

 

What types of trusts are there?

 

To name a few, there are dynasty trusts, charitable trusts, special needs trusts, pet trusts, Medicare/Medicaid  trusts, and life insurance trusts, among many others.

 

What is the benefit of having a trust?

 

Trusts allow you to be able to do things that you could not otherwise do. For example, if you have a disabled child who receives state assistance (i.e. if they live in an assisted living facility where they receive special medical care), if you give your child money, it could make them ineligible for state assistance. However, if you use a special needs trust, assets may be put into that trust by any third party – yourself, your child’s aunts, uncles, friends, anyone! – which the trustee may then spend for the benefit of the disabled child, WITHOUT making them ineligible for state assistance, as long as the trustee follows the rules regarding what the money may be spent on.

 

Another example is trusts for minor children. Under the law, children under  18 are not legally competent.  If you have children who are under the age of 18, they cannot receive money from you if you were to pass away suddenly, even if your will says they can. In your will, you would have to provide for a guardian to manage the money for your children, or the court would appoint a guardian. With a trust, you could have someone manage money for the benefit of your children, following your instructions, without money actually passing into your children’s hands. This is similar to the guardianship situation, but this way, you can have some peace of mind and some control over how to provide for your children if something should happen to you.   

 

How much does a trust cost?

 

The costs of a trust will vary with the complexity of the situation, but they are generally more expensive than a simple will. It is typically well worth the cost to create a trust, as probate costs may be eliminated completely, and the use of a trust may be very beneficial  regarding taxes and other consequences of asset transfers.

 

What should I put into my trust?

 

Trusts must be funded at the time they are created – if there is nothing to put in the trust, it is not a real trust, and it won’t work. Often, real property is used as the basis for a trust fund, but most attorneys recommend against using one’s home as the sole property to fund the trust.

 

Who should be the trustee of my trust?

 

The trustee depends on the circumstances. You may be the trustee of your own trust if it is made during your lifetime, and you may make a trust for your own benefit (though not if you wish to use a spendthrift clause). A trustee should be someone you can trust with making financial decisions, as the trustee has a fiduciary duty to the beneficiaries to distribute and manage funds in their sole interest. The trustee may take a small fee if the trust provides for it, or if provided for by a court of law. If you prefer, many financial companies provide trustee services to manage funds for beneficiaries, and these types of trustees have the added benefit of being neutral third parties in addition to their experience handling financial matters for others.

 

What is a spendthrift trust or spendthrift clause?

 

A spendthrift trust or clause prevents a beneficiary from assigning (i.e. giving) their interest in the trust assets to someone else, like a creditor. These types of trusts and clauses come in handy where a beneficiary tends to spend their money irresponsibly. Most creditors – with the exception of a few “super creditors,” like the state or federal government  – cannot reach the trust assets even if they know the beneficiary has an interest.  However, with a spendthrift trust or clause, the settlor cannot be the beneficiary – otherwise, the spendthrift clause is invalid, and creditors are then able to reach the assets in the trust regardless of what the trust says. 

 

How do I get a trust?

 

Your attorney can draft a trust for you to reflect your needs. If you are considering a trust as a planning tool, consult an attorney to discover the different options in your situation, as well as potential benefits and consequences for your beneficiaries. Trusts are complex, and the advice of an attorney is paramount to successfully reaching your goals with a trust. If you are interested in creating a trust, contact Nye & Associates for a consultation.

 

Legislative Backlash Against Michigan Medical Marijuana Begins

       The backlash against medical marijuana in Michigan, partly as a result of the poor language of the existing law, partly as a result of the abuse of the existing law by some people, and partly because of conservative opposition to the entire idea, has taken three general forms.

      The first form of the backlash is by prosecutors (including the attorney general) and judges who apply the law strictly.

      The second backlash is from local governments using legitimate (and illegitimate) zoning regulations to regulate or prohibit lawful activity.

       The third backlash is coming from the legistlature (and attorney general) in the form of new laws and attorney general opinions.   This backlash is led by Republican Rick Jones of Grand Ledge and Attorney General Bill Schuette.  (Elsewhere in this blog, I note the attorney general’s recent opinion limiting the way caregivers can grow and manage their plants.)  

        Currently, 22 bills are pending in the legislature that somehow affect the Michigan Medical Marijuana Act.  Over the next several weeks, we will examine each of the pending bills.

       First, they are going after the doctors.  In particular, they are going after the “certification mills.”  Currently, a doctor merely has to certify that the patient has a debilitating condition that would benefit from treatment by medical marijuana.  Most patients are not aware that, if they obtain a certification from a doctor and obtain a medical marijuana card, then the patient could still be forced to prove that he or she satisfied the criteria for a debilitating condition.  Nevertheless, the vast majority of medical marijuana patients have been certified by only a handful of doctors, whom do nothing more than have a patient fill out a form, answer a few questions,and  then certify the patient’s qualification.  Everyone familiar with this process, whether proponent or opponent, knows it is a joke and nothing more than a de facto legalization of marijuana for anyone willing to pay a second-rate M.D. or D.O.  $100.00 for an “examination.”  (However, there are some certification clinics, run by doctors, that legitimately establish a doctor-patient relationship and consider the patient’s request in a proper medical context.)

      As a result of the certification mills, there is now pending in the Michigan House Bill No. 4851.   The bill would require a 4 step test to determine if a patient and physician had a “bona fide physician-patient relationship.”   In particular, the bill provides:

1. The physician must complete an in person, physical examination and “full assessment” of both medical history and current medical and psychological condition.

2. The physician treated the patient for the “debilitating condition” for a reason other than obtaining certification; and the doctor has maintained records for the patient “in accord with medically accepted standards.”

3.  The physician has a “reasonable expectation” that he or she will provide follow-up care and treatment to “monitor the efficacy” of the use of marijuana.

4. The physician has notified the patient’s “primary care physician” “if appropriate.”

      Additionally, the bill provides that an “enclosed locked facility” could only be accessed by 1) a patient’s own facility if there was no caregiver, or 2) a caregiver for a patient (a patient could not access his or her caregiver’s facility.)

     Advocates say that those who wish to continue to use medical marijuana should begin aggressively demanding that their primary care doctors consider prescribing medical marijuana so that it becomes a treatment option for mainstream medical providers.